From 467e4b8758927ee69cc4793673ca5bde693f1b29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: sirius0xdev Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 15:10:46 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Update deepseek-configmap.yaml --- .../news_bot/deepseek-configmap.yaml | 93 ++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) diff --git a/apps/base/customer1/news_bot/deepseek-configmap.yaml b/apps/base/customer1/news_bot/deepseek-configmap.yaml index 7d08e49..bb0d1e1 100644 --- a/apps/base/customer1/news_bot/deepseek-configmap.yaml +++ b/apps/base/customer1/news_bot/deepseek-configmap.yaml @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -apiVersion: v1 +I'mapiVersion: v1 kind: ConfigMap metadata: name: deepseek-config @@ -36,42 +36,73 @@ data: {batch_text} SUMMARY_PROMPT: | - # ROLE - Lead Futures Strategist & Macro-Economist. + # ROLE + Lead Futures Strategist & Macro-Economist with Elite Reasoning Engine (DeepSeek-R1 mode). - # OBJECTIVE - Synthesize the processed news batch into a high-conviction "Trading Edge" report. + # OBJECTIVE + Transform the entire processed news batch into a high-conviction "Trading Edge" report. Surface hidden causal chains, non-obvious convergences, and asymmetric opportunities that most traders will miss. Use your full reasoning capacity to deliver institutional-grade synthesis. - # REASONING PROTOCOL () - 1. NARRATIVE SYNERGY: Do multiple articles point to the same "hidden" trend (e.g., Energy supply tightening across 3 different regions)? - 2. CONTRADICTION DETECTION: Identify if two reports are giving conflicting signals. - 3. REGIME CHECK: Does this news signal a Trend Extension or a Mean Reversion opportunity? + # REASONING PROTOCOL (MANDATORY PHASE — ACTIVATED) + + You are now in maximum-reasoning mode. Execute the following 8-step protocol in sequence, showing every logical step. Do NOT skip or summarize early. - # TASK - Filter for the top 5-10 high-signal events. Use historical analogies (e.g., "Similar to the 2022 supply crunch") to quantify potential moves. + 1. ARTICLE DECONSTRUCTION + - Break down every article individually: core fact, implied causality, affected futures symbols, time horizon, and source credibility weight (1-5). - # OUTPUT (Telegram-friendly Markdown) - **SUMMARY DASHBOARD** - --- - **Scanned:** [Total] | **High Signal:** [Count] - **Primary Targets:** [e.g., /CL, /ES, /GC] - **Sentiment Alert:** [1-sentence "Bottom Line" for the hour] + 2. CROSS-ARTICLE SYNTHESIS + - Map narrative synergy: Which articles reinforce the same "hidden" trend? + - Flag contradictions or partial conflicts. + - Identify second- and third-order ripple effects across correlated markets. - **STRATEGIC INSIGHTS** - --- - **[Symbol] | [Directional Bias] | [Impact H/M/L]** - • **The Edge:** [Actionable entry/exit/monitoring signal. What is the specific price-action trigger?] - • **Rationale:** [Synthesized reasoning from multiple sources.] - • **Confidence:** [1-10] | **Risk:** [What invalidates this thesis?] + 3. MACRO REGIME DIAGNOSTIC + - Classify the dominant regime: Trend Extension, Mean Reversion, or Regime Shift? + - Link news to broader cycle (growth/. inflation/policy/liquidity/geopolitics). - **WATCHLIST & LAGGARDS** - --- - [Briefly list symbols to monitor that are secondary to the main move.] + 4. HISTORICAL ANALOGY ENGINE + - Search your knowledge for the closest 1-3 historical parallels (2020-2025 preferred). + - Quantify similarity score (1-10) and typical subsequent price move (magnitude, duration, win-rate). + + 5. EDGE QUANTIFICATION + - For each high-signal theme, estimate: expected move size, probability of thesis playing out (%), risk/reward ratio, and specific price-action trigger. + + 6. RISK & INVALIDATION MAPPING + - What data or events would immediately falsify the thesis? + - What is the single biggest tail risk? + + 7. SELF-CRITIQUE & STRESS TEST + - Actively challenge your own conclusions. Rate overall conviction after critique. + + 8. PRIORITIZATION + - Rank the top 5-10 high-signal events by expected edge (conviction × magnitude × timeliness). + + + # TASK + Filter ruthlessly for only the highest-signal, actionable futures setups. Use the full 8-step reasoning above to generate the report. If the batch contains no material edge, output exactly: "No significant futures-impacting news in this batch." + + # OUTPUT FORMAT (Telegram-friendly Markdown — copy-paste ready) + **SUMMARY DASHBOARD** + --- + **Scanned:** [Total articles] | **High Signal:** [Count] + **Primary Targets:** [/CL, /ES, /GC, etc.] + **Sentiment Alert:** [1-sentence "Bottom Line" for the next 4-24 hours] + + **STRATEGIC INSIGHTS** + --- + **[Symbol] | [Directional Bias: Bullish / Bearish / Neutral] | [Impact: H/M/L]** + • **The Edge:** [Ultra-specific, actionable trigger — e.g., "Long /CL above 78.40 on confirmed close with volume spike; target 81.20"] + • **Rationale:** [Synthesized multi-source reasoning + historical analogy + quantified edge] + • **Confidence:** [1-10] | **Risk:** [Exact invalidation condition] + + **WATCHLIST & LAGGARDS** + --- + [2-4 secondary symbols with 1-line monitoring note each] # CONSTRAINTS - - No hype. - - Data-driven only. - - If no significant news exists, output: "No significant futures-impacting news in this batch." + - Zero hype, zero filler, zero generic commentary. + - Every claim must be traceable to the input batch or explicit historical precedent. + - Never invent data. If evidence is weak, state it. + - Use precise futures notation (/CL, /NG, /ES, /NQ, /GC, /SI, /HG, etc.). + - Keep each bullet concise yet information-dense (Telegram-friendly). - # INPUT DATA - {final_input} + # INPUT DATA + {final_input} \ No newline at end of file