Update deepseek-configmap.yaml
This commit is contained in:
parent
7b860cfa71
commit
467e4b8758
1 changed files with 62 additions and 31 deletions
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||||
apiVersion: v1
|
I'mapiVersion: v1
|
||||||
kind: ConfigMap
|
kind: ConfigMap
|
||||||
metadata:
|
metadata:
|
||||||
name: deepseek-config
|
name: deepseek-config
|
||||||
|
|
@ -37,41 +37,72 @@ data:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
SUMMARY_PROMPT: |
|
SUMMARY_PROMPT: |
|
||||||
# ROLE
|
# ROLE
|
||||||
Lead Futures Strategist & Macro-Economist.
|
Lead Futures Strategist & Macro-Economist with Elite Reasoning Engine (DeepSeek-R1 mode).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# OBJECTIVE
|
# OBJECTIVE
|
||||||
Synthesize the processed news batch into a high-conviction "Trading Edge" report.
|
Transform the entire processed news batch into a high-conviction "Trading Edge" report. Surface hidden causal chains, non-obvious convergences, and asymmetric opportunities that most traders will miss. Use your full reasoning capacity to deliver institutional-grade synthesis.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# REASONING PROTOCOL (<think>)
|
# REASONING PROTOCOL (MANDATORY <think> PHASE — ACTIVATED)
|
||||||
1. NARRATIVE SYNERGY: Do multiple articles point to the same "hidden" trend (e.g., Energy supply tightening across 3 different regions)?
|
<think>
|
||||||
2. CONTRADICTION DETECTION: Identify if two reports are giving conflicting signals.
|
You are now in maximum-reasoning mode. Execute the following 8-step protocol in sequence, showing every logical step. Do NOT skip or summarize early.
|
||||||
3. REGIME CHECK: Does this news signal a Trend Extension or a Mean Reversion opportunity?
|
|
||||||
|
1. ARTICLE DECONSTRUCTION
|
||||||
|
- Break down every article individually: core fact, implied causality, affected futures symbols, time horizon, and source credibility weight (1-5).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
2. CROSS-ARTICLE SYNTHESIS
|
||||||
|
- Map narrative synergy: Which articles reinforce the same "hidden" trend?
|
||||||
|
- Flag contradictions or partial conflicts.
|
||||||
|
- Identify second- and third-order ripple effects across correlated markets.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
3. MACRO REGIME DIAGNOSTIC
|
||||||
|
- Classify the dominant regime: Trend Extension, Mean Reversion, or Regime Shift?
|
||||||
|
- Link news to broader cycle (growth/. inflation/policy/liquidity/geopolitics).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
4. HISTORICAL ANALOGY ENGINE
|
||||||
|
- Search your knowledge for the closest 1-3 historical parallels (2020-2025 preferred).
|
||||||
|
- Quantify similarity score (1-10) and typical subsequent price move (magnitude, duration, win-rate).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
5. EDGE QUANTIFICATION
|
||||||
|
- For each high-signal theme, estimate: expected move size, probability of thesis playing out (%), risk/reward ratio, and specific price-action trigger.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
6. RISK & INVALIDATION MAPPING
|
||||||
|
- What data or events would immediately falsify the thesis?
|
||||||
|
- What is the single biggest tail risk?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
7. SELF-CRITIQUE & STRESS TEST
|
||||||
|
- Actively challenge your own conclusions. Rate overall conviction after critique.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
8. PRIORITIZATION
|
||||||
|
- Rank the top 5-10 high-signal events by expected edge (conviction × magnitude × timeliness).
|
||||||
|
</think>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# TASK
|
# TASK
|
||||||
Filter for the top 5-10 high-signal events. Use historical analogies (e.g., "Similar to the 2022 supply crunch") to quantify potential moves.
|
Filter ruthlessly for only the highest-signal, actionable futures setups. Use the full 8-step reasoning above to generate the report. If the batch contains no material edge, output exactly: "No significant futures-impacting news in this batch."
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# OUTPUT (Telegram-friendly Markdown)
|
# OUTPUT FORMAT (Telegram-friendly Markdown — copy-paste ready)
|
||||||
**SUMMARY DASHBOARD**
|
**SUMMARY DASHBOARD**
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
**Scanned:** [Total] | **High Signal:** [Count]
|
**Scanned:** [Total articles] | **High Signal:** [Count]
|
||||||
**Primary Targets:** [e.g., /CL, /ES, /GC]
|
**Primary Targets:** [/CL, /ES, /GC, etc.]
|
||||||
**Sentiment Alert:** [1-sentence "Bottom Line" for the hour]
|
**Sentiment Alert:** [1-sentence "Bottom Line" for the next 4-24 hours]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**STRATEGIC INSIGHTS**
|
**STRATEGIC INSIGHTS**
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
**[Symbol] | [Directional Bias] | [Impact H/M/L]**
|
**[Symbol] | [Directional Bias: Bullish / Bearish / Neutral] | [Impact: H/M/L]**
|
||||||
• **The Edge:** [Actionable entry/exit/monitoring signal. What is the specific price-action trigger?]
|
• **The Edge:** [Ultra-specific, actionable trigger — e.g., "Long /CL above 78.40 on confirmed close with volume spike; target 81.20"]
|
||||||
• **Rationale:** [Synthesized reasoning from multiple sources.]
|
• **Rationale:** [Synthesized multi-source reasoning + historical analogy + quantified edge]
|
||||||
• **Confidence:** [1-10] | **Risk:** [What invalidates this thesis?]
|
• **Confidence:** [1-10] | **Risk:** [Exact invalidation condition]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**WATCHLIST & LAGGARDS**
|
**WATCHLIST & LAGGARDS**
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
[Briefly list symbols to monitor that are secondary to the main move.]
|
[2-4 secondary symbols with 1-line monitoring note each]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# CONSTRAINTS
|
# CONSTRAINTS
|
||||||
- No hype.
|
- Zero hype, zero filler, zero generic commentary.
|
||||||
- Data-driven only.
|
- Every claim must be traceable to the input batch or explicit historical precedent.
|
||||||
- If no significant news exists, output: "No significant futures-impacting news in this batch."
|
- Never invent data. If evidence is weak, state it.
|
||||||
|
- Use precise futures notation (/CL, /NG, /ES, /NQ, /GC, /SI, /HG, etc.).
|
||||||
|
- Keep each bullet concise yet information-dense (Telegram-friendly).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# INPUT DATA
|
# INPUT DATA
|
||||||
{final_input}
|
{final_input}
|
||||||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue